Europe (UK): +44 1732 316319 | India: +91 20 71531039 | USA: +1 855 2596535

WEB DEMO
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Story
    • The Executive Team
    • Why CRFWEB?
    • Contact
      • Our locations
      • Europe – UK Office
      • India
    • Careers
    • Security and compliance
  • Solutions
    • The EDC process
    • eCRF
    • MedDRA
    • Randomization
    • ePRO
    • eDiary
    • The Clindox App
    • Clindox eLab
    • Innovations Hub
  • Medical Devices
    • Medical Devices Home
    • Introduction to Medical Device Investigations
    • Pre-Licence Investigations
    • Post-Market Investigations
    • Technologies for Investigations
      • technologies for medical device clinical trials
      • ePRO & eDiary for medical device clinical trials
      • EDC for medical device clinical trials
      • The Clindox App for medical devices
      • Clindox eLab
    • Medical Device Regulations
    • Medical Device Resource Centre
    • Clindox for IVD Studies
  • Other Sectors
    • Pharma-Biotech
    • Nutraceuticals
    • CROs
    • Academia
    • Clindox for IVD Studies
  • News
WEB DEMO
  • Home
  • About
    • Our Story
    • The Executive Team
    • Why CRFWEB?
    • Contact
      • Our locations
      • Europe – UK Office
      • India
    • Careers
    • Security and compliance
  • Solutions
    • The EDC process
    • eCRF
    • MedDRA
    • Randomization
    • ePRO
    • eDiary
    • The Clindox App
    • Clindox eLab
    • Innovations Hub
  • Medical Devices
    • Medical Devices Home
    • Introduction to Medical Device Investigations
    • Pre-Licence Investigations
    • Post-Market Investigations
    • Technologies for Investigations
      • technologies for medical device clinical trials
      • ePRO & eDiary for medical device clinical trials
      • EDC for medical device clinical trials
      • The Clindox App for medical devices
      • Clindox eLab
    • Medical Device Regulations
    • Medical Device Resource Centre
    • Clindox for IVD Studies
  • Other Sectors
    • Pharma-Biotech
    • Nutraceuticals
    • CROs
    • Academia
    • Clindox for IVD Studies
  • News

CRFWEB INFO SHEET

Post Market Surveillance (PMS) &  Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) under MDR – An Overview

Post Market Surveillance under MDR

Since the Date of Application (DoA), 26 May 2021, for MDR, manufacturers have a statutory requirement to collect post market clinical data as a continuous process over the device lifetime. The aims of Post Market Surveillance (PMS) under MDR are:

  • Confirming the safety and performance throughout the expected lifetime of the device
  • Ensuring the continued acceptability of identified risks
  • Detecting emerging risks based on factual evidence

The rationale for PMS under MDR

PMS is a cornerstone of MDR. With the explosion in the number of medical devices reaching the market since the turn of the century, it had become increasingly clear that existing compliance processes were no longer fit for purpose and that devices were achieving market entry without adequate clinical data supporting claims for safety – or efficacy.

Under MDD, very many medical devices were CE-marked by demonstrating equivalence to an existing device already used in use. Increasing numbers of devices have achieved compliance by claiming equivalence with products that have, in themselves, used equivalence to gain approval. As a result, devices have come on to the market in recent years which differ significantly from the foundation device originally approved based on compliant trial and study data.  Addressing this glaring and growing deficit was the key motivation for the development of MDR.

Importantly, then, existing devices currently on the market in the EU will need to comply with MDR PMS requirements to retain their CE Mark. Manufacturers will need to ensure that their existing PMS system is MDR-compliant or design and implement a new or revised system appropriate for the type of device and proportionate to the risk class. A PMS Plan will be a mandatory element of the Clinical Evaluation Plan (CEP) required for MDR.

Post Market Clinical Follow up (PMCF)

For most devices – new and existing – PMCF will be a key element of PMS. PMCF is defined as a continuous process that updates the clinical evaluation; the manufacturer is expected to proactively collect and evaluate clinical data from use in or on humans of a device which already bears the CE marking (currently on the market or in service) within its intended purpose.  

Prior to MDR, proactive PMCF activities, such as PMCF studies, were, by and large, limited only to devices in the higher risk classes. This situation was due largely to device manufacturers exploiting shortcomings and loopholes in the regulations and supporting MEDDEV guidelines.

A core expectation of MDR is that the PMS plan will almost certainly feature PMCF. Prior to MDR, proactive PMCF activities, such as PMCF studies, were, by and large, limited only to devices in the higher risk classes. This was not an explicit objective of MDD but was, instead, an unanticipated outcome caused by device manufacturers exploiting shortcomings and loopholes in both MDD regulations and supporting MEDDEV guidelines. No surprises there. PMCF requirements are now far more exacting and many manufacturers – particularly at the lower end of the SME range – are discovering that their Clinical Operations resources and capabilities are inadequate to meet the challenges ahead.

Manufacturers will be expected to produce and a PMCF plan with detailed justifications of the activities included. The Notified Body will have sign-off on the plan and it will also be up to the NB to adjudicate on any request for exemption from PMCF activities based on claimed equivalence.

The stated aims of the PMCF under MDR are:

  • Confirming the safety and performance, including the clinical benefit if applicable, of the device throughout its expected lifetime
  • Identifying previously unknown side-effects and monitor the identified side-effects and contraindications
  • Identifying and analysing emergent risks on the basis of factual evidence
  • Ensuring the continued acceptability of the benefit-risk ratio, referred to in Section 1 and 9 of Annex I in the MDR
  • Identifying possible systematic misuse or off-label use of the device, with a view to verifying that the intended purpose is correct.

The findings of the PMCF are expected to be analysed by the manufacturer and the results documented in a PMCF evaluation report. The PMCF evaluation report will be expected to be an element of the CEP and supporting technical documentation.

The acceptability of the PMCF plan and its application is subject to assessment by the Notified Body. The Notified Body’s assessment of the CEP will also cover the manufacturer’s procedures and documentation of their PMCF activities.

It is role of the Notified Body to assess the justification provided by the manufacturer in relation to non-performance of PMCF-related activities, if that is the course of action suggested by the device manufacturer.

The Notified Body’s opinion concerning the acceptability of the manufacturer’s CEP may also be subject to scrutiny by an EU expert panel. Last month (July 2021), one such panel challenged the NB’s evaluation of a Class III implantable device, deciding that there was insufficient PMCF study data provided by the manufacturer to adequately support their claims. The NB is statutorily bound to consider the opinion and advise the manufacturer on possible remediating actions.

PMCF activities

According to MDR Annexe XVI, part B, general methods for PMCF include:

  • Gathering of clinical experience gained
  • Feedback from users
  • Screening of scientific literature
  • Other sources of clinical data

The list of acceptable “Other sources of clinical data” is not actually set out anywhere in existing MDCG guidelines, but by and large this is likely to be mostly comprised of published data and/or peer-reviewed research on equivalent devices already on the market.

However, these general PMCF methods ALONE are unlikely to be adequate for anything other than the lowest risk, most generic products because they will lack the scientific validity for the demonstration of adequate clinical performance and/or clinical safety now required under MDR.

MEDDEV 2.7/1 Rev 4 Appendix 6 sets out examples of how studies usually fail to reach the bar set by MDR for clinical safety and efficacy.

Usually then, additional, more specific PMCF activities will also be required.

MDCG 2020-7 gives the following examples of PMCF-related activities:

A manufacturer device registry (specific for the type of device or the group of the medical devices the product belongs to) can be indicated together with a description and a summary of the plan. A pre-specification of what quality and quantity data – based on the risk of the device(s) and the associated accessories – to be collected and analysed shall be included. Any possible evaluation of suitable national public registries with clinical data on the manufacturer’s own device and/or on similar devices could be specified in this section, identifying the expected quantity and quality of data to be gathered and the search protocols to be adopted.

PMCF studies (e.g., extended follow up of patients included in the pre-market clinical investigations, new clinical investigations within the intended use, retrospective studies). In case of implantable devices and class III devices where clinical investigations have not been performed pursuant to Article 61 (4), the PMCF plan shall include post market studies to confirm the safety and performance of the device.

Planned Real-world evidence (RWE) analyses could be indicated in this section, together with a summary of the plan including the design, sample size, the endpoints, and analysis population. The real-world data (RWD) from which these analyses are based on should be of sufficient quality and come from reliable data sources.

Surveys planned to collect information about the use of the concerned medical device could be described. schedule for PMCF activities, such as the analysis of PMCF data and reporting, shall be described.

Additionally, the following may also be legitimate PMCF activities, depending on device type and risk class:

  • Investigator-initiated trials or studies (IIT or IIS)
  • Retrospective data reviews from patients previously exposed to the device.
  • Extended follow-up of patients or subjects that took part in trials or investigations that took place prior to a device reaching the market
  • PMCF Cohort Studies
  • PMCF Case Series

For further information concerning PMCF follow the links below:

  • PMCF Studies – an Overview
  • PMCF Planning – an Overview
  • PMCF Activities – a Deeper Dive

How can we help you?

With the advent of MDR, it’s harder than ever to argue that NOT investing in EDC makes sense.

CRFweb is a full-service EDC system optimized for medical devices. CRFweb will support your journey to compliance providing a single, integrated platform for:

  • Clinical trial design
  • Data capture by site or subject
  • Trial process management and troubleshooting
  • Data management, analysis and reporting

The CRFweb software suite delivers all the key functionality you will need to ensure an MDR-compliant clinical trial in an agile, simple-to-use package optimised for the needs of medical devices at a fraction of the cost of the industry big names.

Contact us today to book your demo

5 Star Reviewed

5 Star rated on Capterra

What our clients say

Maria Galligan, PMD Solutions

" The Clindox team have been an incredible support and are always available to help in any way they can."

Dr Salvi, CRF Health, India

" The time and cost saving is really significant. We're very happy with the performance or CRFweb and I wouldn't hesitate to recommend it."

Nigel McLean, Cytosystems, UK

" CRFWEB eCRF, plus their helpful and accommodating staff, helped us quickly set up and personalize, with quick turn-around times of modifications, exactly what we, the clinical staff, and statistical consultants demanded, all at an affordable price "

Kelly Seamans, Atlantia

" The Clindox (CRFWEB) team are dedicated and enthusiastic about accommodating the unique requirements of each individual study and are great value for money."

Dr Satish Kumar, G7 Synergon
"Our international CRO business has utilized Clindox's integrated randomization module and Kit Management. The functionality provides everything we need, and having key trial components integrated into one system is a huge advantage to us in terms of trial efficiencies. Having both randomization and kit management capabilities, aligned with the EDC really simplifies the whole process and significantly reduces the time and effort required to manage our studies and keep control of our processes and inventory. "

Next Steps

For a quick system overview, click here

Seeing is believing. Book a web-based demo now.

Book a demo

Useful Links

  • eCRF
  • eDIARY
  • ePRO
  • MedDRA
  • Randomization
  • Security and compliance

Latest News

June 20, 2022

Meeting the IVDR challenge: digitizing the collection of study data

Read more
March 14, 2022

Covid-19: What has been the impact of the pandemic on India and how have Indian Clinical Trials been affected?

Read more
January 18, 2022

Decentralized Clinical Trials – new kid on the block or a venerable idea resurrected?

Read more

5 Star rated on Capterra

CRFWEB is a clinical trial software application by Clindox

Clindox-8-300x212

Policies

Privacy Policy
Security policy

UK

+44 1732 316319

India

+91 207 1531039

Social Links

Facebook Twitter Linkedin

Registered number: 526690 © Copyright CRFweb 2019

Web design Yorkshire by Feel Design